| |
| Sub-Area
3: Sam Dealey, Kessler Woods and Timbergrove |
| Preamble |
Sam
Dealey Estates and Kessler Woods were the first post-WWII developments
within the current KNU boundaries. Initial homes were primarily
one-and-a-half or two stories giving way almost exclusively to one
story dwellings with the growing popularity of ranch style homes
that responded to the more casual lifestyle of post WWII America.
Early ranch houses were mostly based on western ranch house designs
popular on the west coast and featured elements such as rough hewn
posts on front porches, rustic brick or stone, and cedar shake shingles
(now replaced). As the 1950's progressed, homes now classified as
Mid-Century Modern were constructed in addition to those incorporating
traditionally historic elements within the ranch style framework.
Emphasis was placed on backyards with many of the original homes
featuring outdoor barbeques and large paved private patios for entertaining.
The more modern homes feature large plate glass windows, sliding
glass doors, and decorative metalwork. In addition several homes
in this area were designed by prominent architects. |
Developed
by former Kessler resident and Dallas Mayor Robert Folsom, Timbergrove
Circle represents the next addition to KNU. Starting in 1960, homes
were constructed primarily in both the Contemporary style as well
as more traditional houses still in the Ranch style but with more
emphasis on the vertical structure. |
| Of the 231 post-war homes surveyed by volunteers supervised
by Preservation Dallas in March 2004, the following information
was gathered: |

12% or 28 homes were built in the 1940's
65% or 151 homes were built in the 1950's
18% or 41 homes were built in the 1960's
5% or 11 homes were built in the 1970's |
| These post war homes built beginning in 1947, are
categorized by fairly low roof lines, private outdoor areas created
by the plan of the house, and have elevations with a heavy emphasis
on the horizontal line. The prevalent styles are Western Ranch,
American Colonial Ranch, California (contemporary) Ranch, French
Provincial Ranch and Minimal Traditional. Generally, these homes
are frequently one story although there are multi-level exceptions. |
| |
| Following is a summary and discussion of the elements
in the ordinance for Sub-Area 3: |
| BUILDING MASS AND LOT COVERAGE |
| A. New construction and remodels will adhere to the
following guidelines: |
| 1. |
Front setback shall
be an average of the two adjacent homes (existing footprint),
with the exception of 910 and 940 W. Colorado. (These homes
will have a setback of 25 feet measured from the curb or property
line whichever is greater. Corner lot set back should be no
less than the adjacent property. |
| 2. |
Side setbacks shall
be five (5) feet, the current standard for R7.5, our base
zoning district, however, in addition, we will adopt the side
yard additional setbacks (height looming) similar to the Greenway
Parks Conservation District Ordinance where homes must have
additional setback as they get taller. The height of any structure
may not exceed three times the distance from ground level
of the side or rear property line, with the height being measured
from the ground level at the side or rear property line. For
example, a structure set back six feet from the side yard
line may not exceed 18 feet in height above the ground level
at the side property line. Chimneys are not subject to this
height looming provision. |
| 3. |
Rear setback shall
be five (5) feet, the current standard for R7.5, our base
zoning district with the addition of height looming clause
as stated above. |
| 4. |
Lot coverage will
remain at the current City maximum of 45%. |
| 5. |
Maximum Height will
be thirty (30) feet (measured midpoint between the eave and
ridge) and limited to two full stories only measured from
the street facade |
|
| Explanation: As in Greenway Parks, a value preference
is given to preserving our original homes and therefore if the demand
exists to expand their sizes, a homeowner can actually build more
space by retaining the original structure than by demolishing and
building entirely new. It also allows our houses to grow and change
over time that keeps our housing stock vital to needs of different
generations and changing lifestyles. The anti-looming side yard
setback makes houses move away from their neighbors, as they get
taller to protect privacy and sunlight. The maximum height limitation
is self explanatory for consistency with the scale of our streetscapes. |
| |
| DEMOLITION STANDARDS |
| A. |
A significant house
as designated by Preservation Dallas during the Discover Dallas
Architectural Survey, March 2004, may only be demolished if
the cost of bringing the house in compliance with all applicable
building code requirements using materials conveying a similar
appearance to the original materials is greater than 80% of
the structure's value according to the Dallas Central Appraisal
District. |
| |
Explanation: These
post war homes represent those of architectural and/or social
significance to our neighborhood. Preservation of these properties
will maintain a historic thread throughout the sub-district
illustrating the evolution of the Ranch House. The ability
to remove these homes needs to be tighter than current criteria
of the city. The value of repairs does not include renovations
and thus the demolition would be eligible only for the most
dilapidated properties and not those that are to receive extensive
and expensive renovation/remodeling. |
| B. |
For structures not
designated by Preservation Dallas as significant, there are
no demolition restrictions. |
| C. |
List of Significant
Houses in Sub-area 3: |
|
| |
808 W. Colorado Boulevard
910 W. Colorado Boulevard
940 W. Colorado Boulevard
806 Evergreen Hills Road
823 Evergreen Hills Road
1010 Evergreen Hills Road
1019 Evergreen Hills Road
1027 Evergreen Hills Road
810 W. Greenbriar Lane
827 W. Greenbriar Lane
944 W. Greenbriar Lane |
1661 Kessler Canyon Drive
1510 Kessler Parkway
1516 Kessler Parkway
1522 Kessler Parkway
1626 Kessler Parkway
1708 Kessler Parkway
1810 Kessler Parkway
1828 Kessler Parkway
1834 Kessler Parkway
1934 Kessler Parkway
2022 Kessler Parkway
|
1006 Knott Place
1010 Knott Place
1016 Knott Place
1024 Knott Place
1614 Nob Hill Road
1622 Nob Hill Road
1687 Nob Hill Place
1696 Nob Hill Place
1346 Rainbow Drive
907 Sam Dealey Drive
834 Shady Lane
1931 Timbergrove Circle |
|
| |
| FENCING STANDARDS |
| A. |
Front Yard Fencing:
1. Chain link fencing is specifically prohibited
in the front yard. |
| B. |
Side and Rear Yard
Fencing:
1. For those side yards adjacent to a street
(corner lots), no chain
link fencing shall be permitted on a street side yard. |
|
| |
| FENCING RESTRICTIONS ON ESCARPMENT LOTS |
| Twelve lots within Sub-area 3 also lie in the escarpment
zone. Additional fencing regulations are included in the Conservation
District Ordinance for those properties. The addresses are: |
| |
1906 Kessler Parkway
1910 Kessler Parkway
1914 Kessler Parkway
1924 Kessler Parkway
1934 Kessler Parkway
1940 Kessler Parkway |
1948 Kessler Parkway
1954 Kessler Parkway
2010 Kessler Parkway
2016 Kessler Parkway
2022 Kessler Parkway
2040 Kessler Parkway |
|
| Kessler Park was originally conceived as a sylvan,
park-like setting without fences. Obviously today, property owners
rely on fencing for pets and privacy. Fencing in the future should
enhance the enjoyment and beauty of the neighborhood and thus should
adhere to more careful restrictions than currently allowed by the
city standards. |
| The property owners who reside along the escarpment
should be able to continue to rely on the unrestricted views across
the hills without privacy fencing that by nature of the topography
would not provide privacy. The escarpment is the single most defining
unique element to Kessler Park and makes this a unique setting in
all of Dallas. Using the existing escarpment ordinance serves to
define where the escarpment is located specific to individual lots
within Kessler Park. Enforcement of the existing escarpment ordinance
also will protect native vegetation, require its replacement with
like plant materials, and prevent encroachment with new structures.
It is also used here to restrict fences to those types that preserve
view corridors and vistas that are so enjoyed currently by homes
that were built to take advantage of these views. |
| Where interior lots and side yards above or below
the escarpment allow for privacy, solid privacy fencing shall be
permitted on an interior lot line and within up to twenty-five feet
of the back face of the original house but not within the escarpment.
Property owners abutting Colorado Blvd are particularly in need
of privacy and special consideration is given to their street side
yard fencing needs. |
| Kessler Park uniquely has double-frontage lots whereby
one property's backyard fence abuts a neighbor's front yard. The
appearance and type of fence used in these applications should be
respectful to property owners who share their front door with back
yard fences and thus the same standards created for the escarpment
zone will be applicable to double-frontage lots. |
| |
| NEW CONSTRUCTION AND REMODELING MATERIAL RESTRICTIONS |
| A. |
Exterior Insulated
Foam System (E.I.F.S.) is specifically prohibited. |
|
| |
| PARKING |
| A. |
Garages may be located
anywhere within the lot per the existing R7.5 regulations. |
| B. |
Recreational vehicles,
trailers and boats shall be parked behind the front building
setback and screened from the front street. |
| C. |
The front yard shall
be limited to a maximum of 30% of non-pervious material. |
|
| |
| The following topics were discussed and it was determined
no additional regulation was desired: |
| 1. |
Architectural style |
| 2. |
Roofing materials |
| 3. |
Roof type or pitch |
| 4. |
Paint colors |
| 5. |
Retaining walls |
| 6. |
Floor Area Ratio |
| 7. |
Plant material |
|
|
| Sub-Area 3: Matrix of Development
Standards |
| # |
Item |
Standard Zoning (R-7.5)
|
Sub-Area 3 (Sam
Dealey, Kessler Woods & Timbergrove) |
| 1 |
Height |
30 feet maximum (measured
from the mid-point of the lowest eave to the top of house) |
30 feet maximum (measured
from grade to the mid-point of the lowest eave to the top
of house) |
| 2 |
Front yard setback |
25 feet minimum |
Average of the two adjacent homes
except for 910 and 940 W Colorado which shall have a 25’ setback
measured from the curb or property line, whichever is greater.
Corner lot homes will have a minimum setback of the adjacent
property. |
| 3 |
Rear yard setback |
5 feet minimum |
5 feet minimum for
a structure up to 15 feet tall. Structures must be setback
at a 1:3 ratio of setback to height of structure. Thus an
18 foot structure must have a 6 foot setback; a 30 foot structure
must have a 10 foot setback. Chimneys are not subjected to
this ruling. |
| 4 |
Side yard setback |
5 feet minimum |
5 feet minimum for
a structure up to 15 feet tall. Structures must be setback
at a 1:3 ratio of setback to height of structure. Thus an
18 foot structure must have a 6 foot setback; a 30 foot structure
must have a 10 foot setback. Chimneys are not subjected to
this ruling. |
| 5 |
Front yard fences
Height Material |
4 feet maximum height
No regulation |
4 feet maximum height
No chain link |
| 6 |
Rear yard fences Height
Material |
9 feet maximum height
No regulation |
9 feet maximum height
No regulation |
| 7 |
Corner-side yard fences
Height Material |
9 feet maximum height
No regulation |
9 feet maximum height
No chain link on street side yard |
| 8 |
Driveways |
# |
No regulation |
| 9 |
Lot width |
# |
No regulation |
| 10 |
Lot coverage* |
45% |
45% |
| 11 |
Lot size* |
7500 square foot minimum |
7500 square foot minimum |
| 12 |
Stories* |
No maximum |
2 story maximum |
| 13 |
Floor Area Ratio |
No maximum |
No regulation |
| 14 |
Accessory Structures |
# |
No regulation |
| 15 |
Remodeling |
# |
No regulation |
| 16 |
Additions |
# |
No regulation |
| 17 |
2nd story additions |
# |
No regulation |
| 18 |
Architecture (New
const/ Remodeling) |
# |
No regulation |
| 19 |
Building materials |
# |
EIFS is prohibited |
| 20 |
Roofing material |
# |
No regulation |
| 21 |
Roof type |
# |
No regulation |
| 22 |
Porch enclosures |
# |
No regulation |
| 23 |
Front yard coverage |
# |
30% maximum of non-plant
life material such as cement, stone, gravel, pavers, etc. |
| 24 |
House width |
# |
No regulation |
| 25 |
Painting brick/stone
front |
# |
No regulation |
| 26 |
Paint Colors |
# |
No regulation |
| 27 |
Garages and carports |
# |
No regulation |
| 28 |
Parkway trees |
# |
No regulation |
| 29 |
Retaining walls |
# |
No regulation |
| 30 |
Demolition |
Requires demolition
permit |
A significant house
as designated by Preservation Dallas (March 2004) may only
be demolished if the cost of bringing the house in compliance
with all applicable building code requirements using materials
similar to the conveying appearance of original materials
is greater than 80% of the structure’s value according to
DCAD |
| 31 |
Parking |
# |
Recreational vehicles,
trailers and boats shall be parked behind the front building
setback and screened from public view. |
| 32 |
Foundations |
# |
No regulation |
| 33 |
Windows |
# |
No regulation |
|
| * In sub-area 3, all of these standards were discussed and
voted on prior to making their final recommendations. The
group made a conscientious effort to limit the number or regulations
imposed on their sub-area. Thus, many of those discussed were
voted to remain as they are today. This is indicated by the
phrase “No regulation” next to them. |
|
| |
| Conservation District Links |
|
|
| |
About Us • KNU History
• Virtual Tour • Committees
• Conservation District •
Calendar
Announcements & News •
New Residents • Site Map • Volunteering
• Links • Discussion
Board
Map & Directions • Home
Tours • Architecture •
Mailing List • Contact
Us • Home |
Kessler Neighbors United PO Box 225947 Dallas, Texas
75222-5947 |
|